Industry Solutions Legal, Tax & Professional Services • Worked examples • Zero egress
Legal, Tax & Professional Services • Worked examples

Your procedures, applied as written.
Judgment stays with professionals.

Firms already write their procedures down: intake criteria, conflict checks, filing checklists, review thresholds. Helixor turns those procedures into versioned packs with a closed set of outcomes and a receipt for every decision, and leaves professional judgment with professionals.

See the scenarios ↓ Talk To Sales →

Scenarios on this page

These are examples, not a complete list. A decision usually fits when it has written criteria, pulls from several systems, happens often, and someone may later ask why it went the way it did. Pick one to jump to it.

Matter intake and conflict pre-checks

How it's decided today

A new matter brings the client, adverse parties, related entities, the practice area, estimated fees and the responsible partner. Intake staff run conflict searches, check the firm's criteria on fee size, credit and risk, and send the file to committee when something looks off. Every firm has a story about the matter that should never have been taken.

Where Helixor comes in

Intake criteria become a pack. Each matter comes back accept, refer to the intake committee, or decline, and the conflict pre-check flags the specific party or relationship that needs a look. The conflicts attorney still makes the call. Reversals and committee decisions are captured, and they shape the next version of the criteria.

Pushes it riskier
  • An adverse party related to an existing client
  • A new client in a high-risk industry for the practice
  • Fees below the practice's minimum
  • A prospective client with unpaid fees at another office
Hard stops (a definite no)
  • A direct conflict with a current client and no waiver
  • The client fails know-your-client checks
  • The matter falls in a practice area the firm has exited
What would change the decision
  • A signed conflict waiver
  • Completed KYC documents
  • A different responsible partner or office

What the audit record holds

  • Receipt, pack ID and version
  • Matter number
  • Rules that fired, including which party triggered the conflict flag
  • Committee decision and date
example log entry your application writesillustrative
{
  "matter": "2026-NY-004812",
  "receipt": "hx_proof_4be09d1a7c35f2e8a60b9d13",
  "pack": "firm.intake_criteria v6",
  "action": "refer_intake_committee",
  "rules": ["INT-ADVERSE-AFFILIATE-CLIENT"],
  "input_sha256": "c3e7...5a82",
  "remedy": ["signed waiver from affected client"],
  "logged_at": "2026-09-28T13:07:59Z"
}

↑ Back to scenarios

Tax return review routing

How it's decided today

A prepared return comes with the prior year return, wage and 1099 forms, schedules and the preparer's notes. Firms decide how much review each return gets based on complexity, dollar changes and risk areas. In busy season that decision often comes down to whoever has capacity.

Where Helixor comes in

Helixor applies your review thresholds to every return: ready to file, preparer self-review, senior review, or partner review, with the reasons listed. Returns that can't be filed yet (missing authorization, identity check pending) are held with exactly what's needed. Review findings come back as outcomes for next season's thresholds.

Pushes it riskier
  • A large change in income or deductions from last year
  • A home office or vehicle deduction
  • A cash-heavy business
  • Digital asset transactions
  • A first-year client
Hard stops (a definite no)
  • No signed e-file authorization
  • An identity verification check still pending
  • An engagement letter that hasn't been signed
What would change the decision
  • Substantiation for the flagged deduction
  • The signed authorization
  • A reconciled prior year carryforward

What the audit record holds

  • Receipt and pack version (one per tax season)
  • Return ID and preparer
  • Thresholds that fired
  • Reviewer and sign-off date

↑ Back to scenarios

Filing deadline and document checks

How it's decided today

Before a filing goes out, someone checks that every required document is present, dates line up, and the deadline has been computed correctly under the procedural rules. Most of it is checklist work, and the misses are expensive.

Where Helixor comes in

Each filing type gets a pack. The filing comes back ready, missing items (listed), or date conflict, before anyone signs.

Pushes it riskier
  • A deadline within two business days
  • An exhibit referenced but not attached
  • A date computed across a holiday
Hard stops (a definite no)
  • A required document is missing
  • The computed deadline has passed
What would change the decision
  • Attaching the missing document
  • Correcting the date

What the audit record holds

  • Receipt and pack version
  • Matter and filing type
  • Items that fired
  • Who filed and when

↑ Back to scenarios

Busy season review staffingSolver

How it's decided today

In tax season, managers assign returns to preparers and reviewers from a spreadsheet. They weigh credentials, independence, client relationships, capacity and deadlines. The work piles up on the same few senior people, and extensions get filed that didn't need to be.

Where Helixor comes in

Credential requirements, independence rules and deadlines go into the pack. The solver assigns each return to a preparer and reviewer, balancing load, and reassigns when someone is out or a client sends documents late. Review routing from the pack decides how much review each return needs; the solver decides who does it. The pack holds the hard rules and the goal. The solver searches for the best plan that satisfies every hard rule, working from the same typed state the decision core uses. If no plan can satisfy them all, it tells you so instead of quietly breaking one. The solvers are built for GPUs, and that's where large plans solve fastest. Solvers are in Preview today.

What the solver optimizes
  • Most returns filed by the deadline without extension
  • Balanced hours across the team
  • Keeping client relationships with the same team where possible
Hard constraints it never breaks
  • Reviewer holds the required credential for the return type
  • No independence or conflict issue with the client
  • Nobody scheduled beyond their weekly cap
  • Partner review for returns that require it
What would change the plan
  • A client sends documents late
  • Someone joins or leaves the team
  • An extension is approved
  • Review routing moves a return up a level

What the audit record holds

  • Receipt and pack version for each assignment run
  • Return, preparer and reviewer IDs
  • Binding constraints
  • Filed on time or extended

↑ Back to scenarios

Other decisions that fit

More examples

DecisionWhat Helixor decides
Team routingAssign practice group, office and seniority, with reasoning for complex matters.
Privilege decisionsNot automated. These stay with people.

Recommended deployment

WorkloadPattern
Intake and docketingCore runtime next to the practice management system
Firm-wide policyShared decision service behind an authenticating gateway
Unclear mattersHybrid escalation, as engagement terms allow
How to start

Pick one procedure, like the document checklist for a single filing type, and write it as a playbook. Capture corrections from the first week (reversals, reassignments, rejections). They become proposed improvements to the procedure.

↑ Back to scenarios

Pick one decision.
We'll show you the receipt.

Bring a written policy and a handful of past cases. We'll turn it into a pack and run it next to your current process so you can compare.

Helixor Decision Engine ~25µs Typical • 0 Bytes Egress • Optimized for GPUs
Try it Now → Talk To Sales