Industry Solutions Pharma & Life Sciences • Worked examples • Zero egress
Pharma & Life Sciences • Worked examples

Procedure applied evenly.
A receipt for every call.

Life sciences work runs on written procedure: protocols, SOPs, specifications. The expensive mistakes happen when procedure is applied unevenly or when nobody can later show how a call was made. Helixor turns that procedure into versioned packs, runs them where your data already lives, and keeps a receipt for every decision.

See the scenarios ↓ Talk To Sales →

Scenarios on this page

These are examples, not a complete list. A decision usually fits when it has written criteria, pulls from several systems, happens often, and someone may later ask why it went the way it did. Pick one to jump to it.

Clinical trial eligibility pre-screening

How it's decided today

Site coordinators screen candidates against a protocol's inclusion and exclusion criteria using lab results, medication lists, diagnoses and history from the EHR. Protocols run to dozens of criteria, amendments change them mid-study, and screening is mostly done by hand from a PDF.

Where Helixor comes in

The protocol's criteria become a pack. Each candidate comes back as eligible for a screening visit, not eligible, or needs investigator review, and the remedy lists which criteria failed. A protocol amendment is a new pack version, so you always know which version of the criteria screened each person. The investigator still confirms eligibility.

Pushes it riskier
  • A lab value close to a cutoff
  • A washout period that is almost, but not quite, complete
  • A concomitant medication on the caution list
  • A diagnosis date near the protocol window
Hard stops (a definite no)
  • A prohibited concomitant medication
  • Age outside the protocol range
  • Participation in another interventional trial within the exclusion window
  • A lab value clearly outside the allowed range
What would change the decision
  • Completing the washout period
  • A repeat lab within the allowed window
  • A medication change approved by the treating physician

What the audit record holds

  • Receipt, pack ID and version (which maps to the protocol amendment)
  • Every criterion that fired
  • Hash of the screening record, never the record
  • Investigator sign-off, linked by candidate ID
example log entry your application writesillustrative
{
  "candidate_id": "SITE14-0387",
  "receipt": "hx_proof_0de7f2b91c4a58e3d6a2b7c1",
  "pack": "study_ab123.eligibility amendment-3",
  "action": "investigator_review",
  "rules": ["INC-07-EGFR-BORDERLINE"],
  "input_sha256": "e8a3...40cc",
  "remedy": ["repeat eGFR within 14 days"],
  "logged_at": "2026-09-28T16:20:05Z"
}

↑ Back to scenarios

Batch release readiness

How it's decided today

Before a batch can be released, QA works through the batch record, deviations, in-process tests, environmental monitoring and the certificate of analysis. Most of that review is confirming that everything is present, signed and inside spec, which leaves less time for the few things that need real judgment.

Where Helixor comes in

Helixor checks completeness and consistency before QA opens the file: ready for QA review, hold, or reject candidate. It doesn't release anything. The qualified person does. What changes is that QA starts from a list of exactly what's open, and every check has a receipt tied to the batch number.

Pushes it riskier
  • Open minor deviations
  • Results near a specification limit
  • An environmental monitoring excursion during the run
  • A material close to its expiry date
Hard stops (a definite no)
  • An out-of-specification result without an approved investigation
  • A missing signature or date on a critical step
  • An expired material used in the batch
What would change the decision
  • Closing the deviation with an approved CAPA
  • A retest done under the procedure
  • Completing the missing entries

What the audit record holds

  • Receipt and pack version (which maps to the SOP revision)
  • Batch number and product
  • Every check that fired
  • QA disposition and who signed it

↑ Back to scenarios

Adverse event case intake

How it's decided today

Adverse event reports come in from call centers, sales reps, literature and partners, in every format. Each case needs a seriousness and expectedness assessment so it lands on the right reporting clock, and a missed clock is a real regulatory problem.

Where Helixor comes in

Helixor applies your intake rules to each case and routes it: expedited, standard periodic, or medical review. Anything that mentions death or a life-threatening event always takes the expedited path. Free-text narratives that are unclear can go to hosted reasoning, which can abstain and hand the case to a safety physician rather than guess.

Pushes it riskier
  • Mention of hospitalization
  • An event not listed in the reference safety information
  • A pregnancy exposure
  • A report from a patient using the product off-label
Hard stops (a definite no)
  • Death or a life-threatening event always goes to the expedited path
  • A case missing the minimum criteria for a valid report goes back for follow-up
What would change the decision
  • Follow-up information from the reporter
  • Medical review downgrading seriousness
  • Confirmation that the event is listed

What the audit record holds

  • Receipt and pack version
  • Case ID and clock start date
  • Seriousness and expectedness rules that fired
  • The safety physician's assessment

↑ Back to scenarios

Clinical trial supply allocationSolver

How it's decided today

Trial supply teams decide how many kits of each treatment arm to send to each depot and site. They balance enrollment forecasts, expiry dates, shipping lanes that can hold temperature, import permits and the need to keep blinding intact. Too little and a patient can't be dosed. Too much and expensive drug expires on a shelf.

Where Helixor comes in

Expiry rules, lane approvals, permits and blinding rules go into the pack, and the goal is to cover forecast demand with as little waste as possible. The solver produces the resupply plan for each depot and site. Every shipment in the plan is then checked by the decision core and gets a receipt tied to the protocol and the kit lots. The pack holds the hard rules and the goal. The solver searches for the best plan that satisfies every hard rule, working from the same typed state the decision core uses. If no plan can satisfy them all, it tells you so instead of quietly breaking one. The solvers are built for GPUs, and that's where large plans solve fastest. Solvers are in Preview today.

What the solver optimizes
  • No site stocks out before the next resupply
  • Least drug expiring unused
  • Lowest shipping cost
  • Fewest shipments per site
Hard constraints it never breaks
  • Kits must have enough shelf life to cover the dosing window
  • Only temperature-qualified lanes
  • Import permits in place for the destination country
  • Shipment mix can't reveal which arm a patient is on
What would change the plan
  • An updated enrollment forecast
  • A new lot with a longer expiry
  • A lane qualified for a new route
  • A site that pauses enrollment

What the audit record holds

  • Receipt, pack ID and version for the plan
  • Protocol version and forecast date
  • Kit lots and expiry dates allocated
  • Binding constraints
  • Actual dispensing, for the next forecast

↑ Back to scenarios

Other decisions that fit

More examples

DecisionWhat Helixor decides
Deviation classificationClassify a deviation as minor, major or critical and open the right workflow.
Supplier qualification checksConfirm audits, quality agreements and certificates are current before a PO is released.

Recommended deployment

WorkloadPattern
Sites and plantsIn-process or loopback sidecar next to the EDC, MES or LIMS
Proprietary or restricted dataAir-gapped, with packs compiled on site
Unclear narrativesHybrid escalation with redacted text only
Where Helixor stops

Helixor checks procedure. It does not make the release decision, confirm trial eligibility, or assess causality. Those stay with the qualified person, the investigator and the safety physician. Pack versions map cleanly to protocol amendments and SOP revisions, which makes the audit trail easy to follow.

↑ Back to scenarios

Pick one decision.
We'll show you the receipt.

Bring a written policy and a handful of past cases. We'll turn it into a pack and run it next to your current process so you can compare.

Helixor Decision Engine ~25µs Typical • 0 Bytes Egress • Optimized for GPUs
Try it Now → Talk To Sales